The safety inspection should focus on the "four changes"

The major security inspection is a special survey form of the implementation of the safety management system of the subordinate units. Practice has proved that this form has played a positive role in strengthening grassroots units’ awareness of safety, regulating safety management, and eliminating potential safety hazards. It is worthy of full recognition and should be sustained in the long run. However, this form needs to be further improved and improved. Safety inspection should focus on the "four changes."

I. Analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of the current security inspection

On the inspection date, greeting in advance will facilitate the implementation of the plan and cooperate with the inspected units to ensure that the inspections are carried out in an orderly manner. However, this has caused the inspected units to “stuck on their feet” in order to cope with the inspection, and relaxed the basic practice of “always burning incense”, resulting in the occurrence of habitual violations on weekdays.

On the inspection object, it is determined from the several key lists that are recommended in advance by the inspected unit, which saves time and saves time, and it also harmonizes the relationship between the top and bottom. However, the awareness of the units that have not been included in the scope of inspections has been reduced even more.

In the inspection method, listening, seeing, asking, checking, and evaluating help to grasp the basic situation of the pros and cons of the unit being inspected. However, the “questioning” aspect is often conducted at a convening symposium. It can be said that few people can speak upright, or else they will bear the burden of “scarifying the unit and giving the leadership an inconvenience”. Therefore, it is impossible to ask what "famous."

In terms of inspection results, each sample is sampled 1 to 2 days, which is beneficial to the situation of wide surfaces. However, because of the short time, large content, and wide inspection area, it is often easy to go through the field.

Second, the improvement of safety inspection measures

In light of the existing problems, the security inspection must also focus on the “four transitions” while sticking to the methods and steps that were effective in the past:

For the determination of the date of inspection, the change from a ventilation test to a no appointment examination should be made. It is best not to advance notice and engage in “sudden assault” to see how the normal status of the seized unit is managed. The product is “authentic”.

For the subject to be inspected, it should be recommended by the subordinate unit to change to the "sea election" by the superior unit. Which units to check should be decided by the examiner. Even if the subordinates recommend the "inspected object," the examiner should appropriately select the object to be inspected from the objects that have not been recommended.

To understand the relevant issues, it should be transformed from a collective discussion to personal conversation. Let the masses of workers eliminate their concerns, speak freely, speak the truth, and tell the truth. Speaking out personal opinions or suggestions, this may add a bit of "freshness" to lessons learned.

As far as the scope and effectiveness of inspections are concerned, they should be changed from more to fewer and more refined. Avoid "squeezing some water" and pay attention to "dissection of sparrows", and strive to make inspections achieve the purpose of unity of form and content.

The "four transitions" were implemented in the security inspection, which added to the unconventional nature of the previous single investigation. The use of a combination of investigations and unannounced visits to conduct security inspections may lead to unsatisfactory results. For example, due to failure to greet in advance, the upper-level inspection team was no longer waiting for the inspection of the unit, and lacked the atmosphere of “welcome to the road” and “welcome to slogan welcome”. Before the inspection, there was no preparation. The unsafe factors and problems in the inspected unit were When the inspection is performed, it will be exposed as "Western style" and so on. In actual fact, whether it is the examiner or the person being inspected, if he can face up to the purpose of inspection to eliminate all kinds of safety hazards on the safety channel, and write down records of “illegal” and “accident” double zero on one landmark after another. , then, in the security inspection process, it is worthwhile to see some "phenomenon on the surface". In this way, it is more practical to reflect than an accident.

Using inspections and investigations in the form of combined inspections and unannounced visits, the resulting effect will be more pronounced. For superiors, it is beneficial to grasp the facts of the units being inspected, and is conducive to the "pulse" of the quasi-inspected units, which is conducive to prescribing the "remedies" for remedying the disease, and is conducive to exploring and resolving common problems in the system. Laws; For the unit being inspected, it is helpful to warn against the phenomenon and behavior of “reliance and checking the strings”, which is conducive to cultivating a good style of observing discipline and observing discipline, seeking truth and being pragmatic, and is conducive to strengthening “rule” and governance. The awareness of safety responsibilities without “preventing” or preventing is conducive to the normal operation of the normal safety management mechanism.

This article is a reprint of online media. It only represents the author's point of view. It has nothing to do with this site. If news articles and comments infringe your legal rights, please call us and we will handle it in a timely manner.