In the early morning of May 6, the US suddenly issued a tweet on Twitter, claiming that it would raise tariffs on Chinese goods again this Friday, and threatened to impose tariffs on all Chinese exports to the United States.
Just two or three days ago, he also said to the media with eloquence that "the United States and China are close to reaching a 'very historic, landmark' economic and trade agreement."
When the voice did not fall, there was a big turn of 180 degrees.
It is quite surprising.
If you look at this matter, you can say a few things.
First of all, the wording of extreme pressure is reflected in Twitter's wording. What kind of negative impact this will have on the consultation depends on the next action of the US.
As of now, the US Trade Representative Office (USTR) has not announced a declaration of tariff measures. Many analysts believe that the wording of Twitter may be a means of extreme pressure in Sino-US consultations.
Put on the look of the table and see if you can get some more.
China’s response to this is very simple, just a word.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs made a brief response at the regular press conference on the afternoon of the 6th.
Regarding the US threat to impose tariffs on Chinese products, similar situations have occurred many times before. The position and attitude of the Chinese side have always been very clear, and the US is very clear about this.
In Tao Ran’s notes, it’s not too surprising to throw this content at the crucial moment of the consultation.
In fact, the US side should now seriously consider the negative impact of this statement on itself.
On behalf of the lobbying organization of more than 150 trade associations in the United States, Tariffs Hurt the Heartland said in a statement that in the past 10 months, Americans have been paying for the full cost of the trade war, not China; Will punish American farmers, businesses and consumers. The statement pointed out that ... recent estimates show that raising the tariff to 25% will damage nearly 1 million US jobs and increase financial market turmoil.
Fighting trade, there is no winner.
If someone can't see this after more than a year of competition, then the facts will only go to him again and again until he sees it.
Secondly, the low-profile attitude in the early stage indicates that China is ready to respond to various situations.
The US often emphasizes that China does not satisfy certain demands of the US, but as to whether such appeals are reasonable, whether it is truly fair or not is often ignored.
If we ignore China’s sincere attitude and actions and don’t care about true fairness, it’s not surprising to produce such a result.
From another angle, we can also see that China has repeatedly emphasized the position of " resolutely defending the core interests of the country and the fundamental interests of the people and never compromise on the issue of principle " for more than a year. It is not empty talk, but a slogan and a promise.
The premise of negotiating and negotiating is mutual respect, equality and mutual benefit. Some people feel that the threat is good, so naturally they must be prepared to bear the corresponding consequences. Looking back now, the low-key of China in the past period of time should be the performance after fully estimating various situations.
The experience of more than a year proves that the impact of the US tariff increase is controllable, and the economic data of the first quarter confirms the tenacity of the Chinese economy.
If anyone feels that they can try again, he will find that China is ready to respond to various situations.
Third, China’s policy of “maintaining openness and adhering to high-quality development†will not change.
Some people will find that the trade war has been talked about for more than a year, and China’s position has not changed much.
The attitude of "do not want to fight, not afraid to fight, have to fight if necessary" has not changed;
The attitude of “firmly safeguarding national dignity and core interests†has not changed;
The attitude of "maintaining openness, high-quality development, and the key is to do your own thing" has not changed.
The US itself often said that if a method works, then whether it is a clever way or a clumsy method is a good way.
Based on the current volume comparison and development trend analysis between China and the United States, as long as we can concentrate on developing ourselves and insist that “the key is to do our own thingâ€, then no matter what measures Americans take, the negative impacts are predictable and controllable.
Of course, the principle of our openness is also very clear. As stated in the “Belt and Road†summit forum, it is necessary to look at three “favorablesâ€.
It is conducive to promoting high-quality economic development, is conducive to satisfying people's yearning for a better life, and is conducive to world peace, stability and development.
When you don't understand it, take this standard to get a card, and the amount will be clearer.
It is good for us, no one needs to say, we will do it too.
If it is not good for us, let's say that we will break the big day and don't feel that we will give in.
Don't even think about it.
On the contrary, the US side needs to recognize the situation and see where the best interests lie.
I want to see them, they toss and toss, and I am afraid I still can't get around the negotiating table.
Before that day, maintaining the strength is the most important factor in dealing with the Sino-US issue. No matter what the situation is, we will not change the rhythm of our own development and cannot change.
Before the Chinese side prepares to go to the US for consultations, it is still the same thing to do their own thing, instead of listening to others saying that the wind is rain, which is the fundamental solution to the problems and contradictions. (
Scaffolding System&Accessories
Scaffolding System&Accessories,System Scaffolding Parts,Scaffolding Parts And Accessories,Scaffolding Accessories For Sale
HENGSHUI PIONEER IMP & EXP TRADING CO ., LTD , https://www.hspioneer.com