As the world’s largest exporter of ceramic products, under the environment of “black clouds†shrouded in the world economy, the “sea-going†route of the Chinese ceramic industry will be bound to suffer the setback of “stormâ€.
The EU anti-dumping case against China in the so-called “largest anti-dumping case in the history of ceramics†has not yet been settled, and the anti-dumping turmoil of South Korean tiles against China has started again. On June 2nd, the Korea Trade Commission made an anti-dumping judgment, ruling the anti-dumping duty rate imposed on Chinese ceramic tile manufacturers from 9.14 to 29.41, other suppliers levying an anti-dumping rate of 16.07 and extending the anti-dumping duties on Chinese tiles for another 3 years .
The anti-dumping case involved more than 300 Foshan ceramics enterprises, among which the famous enterprises such as Jianyi, Xinzhongyuan, and Louis Valentino were subject to a high tax of 29.41. This is because since China's anti-dumping of Chinese tiles in 2005, Chinese tiles have once again suffered from anti-dumping investigations in South Korea, and the maximum anti-dumping rate is more than four times higher than the 2005 anti-dumping. The result of the anti-dumping final ruling will be announced on July 12th, and this anti-dumping case will also make the export of Chinese tiles, which has been frequently blocked by exports, become "somewhat worse".
In this South Korean anti-dumping investigation against Chinese tiles, it is worth noting that according to the Korean Trade Commission’s final judgment list, only a few ceramic companies that were judged to impose high tariffs actively responded to ceramics, and some did not respond. Enterprises only impose anti-dumping tariffs of 16.07, and even some enterprises have obtained an ultra-low tax rate of 9.14. At present, the China Ceramic Industry Association has sent a letter to the South Korean Trade Commission, stating that the South Korean side unilaterally determined and implemented an unreasonable part of the anti-dumping tax rate. After learning that South Korea's anti-dumping reports on Chinese tiles, Foshan ceramics companies have expressed that they will actively respond to the lawsuit. .
In order to solve the anti-dumping investigation of South Korea's tiles against China through a reasonable and legal approach for the common interests of the Chinese ceramics industry, on June 29th, the China Ceramic Industry Association took the lead to host the ceramics of Louis Valentino, Asian Ceramics, Asia, Special Region, and Jianyi. The “representation of Chinese companies to attend—the opposition to anti-dumping investigations by the Korean government and unfair treatment of the seminar†was held in Foshan.
At the meeting, the letter sent by the Association to the Republic of Korea was read out, pointing out the unreasonable practice of unilateral decision by South Korea. The letter clearly stated that Smyk, Asia Miner, and Jane I. Ceramics received the lowest tax rate treatment in the anti-dumping case in the EU and 17.37 in South Korea. The high tax rate; Shangyuan and Xinzhongyuan won 7.4 in the first round, but this time it was as high as 37.4, and the irrational position of the ruling demanded the Korean side to reconsider and deal with bilateral trade frictions in an open and fair manner.
The reporter also learned at the meeting that for the unfair judgment of the Korea Trade Commission, Chinese ceramics industry people will unite and seek fair treatment through reasonable and legal legal procedures. At present, the China Ceramic Industry Association is actively organizing related member companies to prepare counterclaims against the unfair judgments of the Korea Trade Commission and led by Louis Valentino Ceramics Co., Ltd., in conjunction with other ceramic tile companies and industry associations, to jointly submit to the Ministry of Commerce and the World Trade Organization. Chinese companies' opinions.
The EU anti-dumping case against China in the so-called “largest anti-dumping case in the history of ceramics†has not yet been settled, and the anti-dumping turmoil of South Korean tiles against China has started again. On June 2nd, the Korea Trade Commission made an anti-dumping judgment, ruling the anti-dumping duty rate imposed on Chinese ceramic tile manufacturers from 9.14 to 29.41, other suppliers levying an anti-dumping rate of 16.07 and extending the anti-dumping duties on Chinese tiles for another 3 years .
The anti-dumping case involved more than 300 Foshan ceramics enterprises, among which the famous enterprises such as Jianyi, Xinzhongyuan, and Louis Valentino were subject to a high tax of 29.41. This is because since China's anti-dumping of Chinese tiles in 2005, Chinese tiles have once again suffered from anti-dumping investigations in South Korea, and the maximum anti-dumping rate is more than four times higher than the 2005 anti-dumping. The result of the anti-dumping final ruling will be announced on July 12th, and this anti-dumping case will also make the export of Chinese tiles, which has been frequently blocked by exports, become "somewhat worse".
In this South Korean anti-dumping investigation against Chinese tiles, it is worth noting that according to the Korean Trade Commission’s final judgment list, only a few ceramic companies that were judged to impose high tariffs actively responded to ceramics, and some did not respond. Enterprises only impose anti-dumping tariffs of 16.07, and even some enterprises have obtained an ultra-low tax rate of 9.14. At present, the China Ceramic Industry Association has sent a letter to the South Korean Trade Commission, stating that the South Korean side unilaterally determined and implemented an unreasonable part of the anti-dumping tax rate. After learning that South Korea's anti-dumping reports on Chinese tiles, Foshan ceramics companies have expressed that they will actively respond to the lawsuit. .
In order to solve the anti-dumping investigation of South Korea's tiles against China through a reasonable and legal approach for the common interests of the Chinese ceramics industry, on June 29th, the China Ceramic Industry Association took the lead to host the ceramics of Louis Valentino, Asian Ceramics, Asia, Special Region, and Jianyi. The “representation of Chinese companies to attend—the opposition to anti-dumping investigations by the Korean government and unfair treatment of the seminar†was held in Foshan.
At the meeting, the letter sent by the Association to the Republic of Korea was read out, pointing out the unreasonable practice of unilateral decision by South Korea. The letter clearly stated that Smyk, Asia Miner, and Jane I. Ceramics received the lowest tax rate treatment in the anti-dumping case in the EU and 17.37 in South Korea. The high tax rate; Shangyuan and Xinzhongyuan won 7.4 in the first round, but this time it was as high as 37.4, and the irrational position of the ruling demanded the Korean side to reconsider and deal with bilateral trade frictions in an open and fair manner.
The reporter also learned at the meeting that for the unfair judgment of the Korea Trade Commission, Chinese ceramics industry people will unite and seek fair treatment through reasonable and legal legal procedures. At present, the China Ceramic Industry Association is actively organizing related member companies to prepare counterclaims against the unfair judgments of the Korea Trade Commission and led by Louis Valentino Ceramics Co., Ltd., in conjunction with other ceramic tile companies and industry associations, to jointly submit to the Ministry of Commerce and the World Trade Organization. Chinese companies' opinions.
Rectangular Return Air Duct,Heat Insulation Air Duct Systems,Duct Air Conditioners,Air Conditioning Ducts
Jiangsu Buna Technology Development Co. , Ltd. , https://www.bunaduct.com